GeekBench5 Benchmark-score voor A12 Bionic versus Snapdragon 855 Plus en A12 versus Snapdragon 780G. In single core scoorde A12 Bionic 1106 punten en Snapdragon 780G slaagde erin 795 te scoren, wat 39% lager is dan A13. Ondertussen scoorde de Snapdragon 855+ nog lager met 783 punten, 41% lager dan A13 Bionic.In multi-core scoorde A12 Bionic Wecompared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (Adreno 640) with the newer 6-core Apple A15 Bionic (Apple GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Qualcomm the giant of SoC's market came last , taking the wraps off the Snapdragon 855 built under 7nm process. While all these offerings are future forward and tuned to make the most of the technologies slated to steal the headlines of 2019. There are few differences between these processor, lt's know them in details. First Round : Performance Incontrast to the Snapdragon 855 4-core AI engine, A12 Bionic features an 8-core neural engine which has a performance capacity of 5 trillion AI tasks per second. Apart from predictive analysis and face detection, this processor allows resource allocation. Hence A12 Bionic can direct additional power processing and smartly compute to run Thôngsố kỹ thuật và điểm chuẩn so sánh CPU Apple A12 Bionic vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) AppleA12 Bionic Snapdragon 855; Proprietà: Apple A12 Bionic: Snapdragon 855: Processo di progettazione: 7nm: 7nm: Architettura: 64-bit: 64-bit: processore: Processore a 6 core (2x Performance core + 4x Efficiency core) 8 CPU Kryo 485 con clock fino a 2, 84 GHz: GPU: GPU a 4 core progettata da Apple: Adreno 640: telecamera: ISP di Apple: Doppi Juga A12 Bionic lebih hemat daya dan lebih hemat daya. Berbeda dengan implementasi CPU 6-core A12, Snapdragon 855 memiliki konfigurasi 8-core. Qualcomm telah memilih pengaturan tri-cluster, bukan pengaturan dua cluster biasa. Actually 9611 is weaker than snapdragon 712 at least on paper. Snapdragon 660 vs 665 vs Snapdragon 675 vs 710 Comparison - Antutu-Geekbench benchmark scores. Samsung Galaxy M30s and Galaxy M10s For display, the Exynos 9610 and 9611 can support up to 1600 x 2520 pixels Full HD+ display panels for larger display devices, which should be. Comparisonof the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A12 Bionic on one side and the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.5GHz. Comparisonof the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ on one side and the Apple A12 Bionic on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.0GHz. 7hbpFWq. Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus 855+ Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in 2019. Compared to the normal Snapdragon 855, the 855 Plus offers higher clock speeds of the GPU and CPU. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz up from GHz in the 855 and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. As the SD855, the 855+ integrates an Adreno 640 graphics card that is now higher clocked and should offer a 15% higher performance. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855+ at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855+ ...Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus...Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points min 30069 avg 34737 median 32129 27% max 42240 Points min 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points min 3137 avg 4371 median 4659 58% max 4737 Points min 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points min 3143 avg 4323 median 65% max 4725 Points min 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points min 738 avg 751 median 751 32% max 764 Points min 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points min 2652 avg 2659 median 9% max 2665 Points min 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 761 avg 782 median 3% max 792 Points min 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2519 avg 2788 median 9% max 2940 Points min 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points min 3603 avg 3654 median 3654 38% max 3705 Points min 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points min 9705 avg 10547 median 12% max 11388 Points min 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms min 2007 avg 2054 median 2032 2% max 2134 ms min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points min 23781 avg 24606 median 24571 23% max 25353 Points min 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points min 89 avg median 98 23% max 111 Points min 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points min 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points min 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points min 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points min 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points min 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points min 66276 avg 72044 median 71855 60% max 78191 Points min 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points min 64026 avg 80567 median 67% max 92659 Points min 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points min 169591 avg 184179 median 184036 34% max 199051 Points min 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points min 132673 avg 139174 median 139170 50% max 145684 Points min 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points min 462125 avg 478464 median 474972 46% max 501784 Points min 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points min 237506 avg 249793 median 249792 33% max 262079 Points min 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 6325 avg 7543 median 7424 39% max 8880 Points min 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 13484 avg 15895 median 34% max 18305 Points min 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8702 avg 10315 median 68% max 11690 Points min 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10286 avg 13201 median 12786 64% max 15510 Points min 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus → 102% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 96% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445420 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11491 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11491 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11491 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 17 return log +0s ... VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments 6 Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs 61% better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more cores14% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2490 MHz Pros of Apple A12 Bionic Higher GPU frequency ~92%Better instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 141555 127267 GPU 184296 196436 Memory 62560 99161 UX 131223 104297 Total score 522806 531765 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 21 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning 48 images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s 745 Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 69% Graphics test 18 FPS 31 FPS Score 3096 5218 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 56 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 57 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A12 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2490 MHz Instruction set L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A12 Bionic GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 585 MHz 1125 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 899 Gigaflops 560 Gigaflops Vulkan version - OpenCL version - DirectX version 12 - Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Neural Engine Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3 Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Intel XMM 7560 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 1244 Total votes 2665 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions Ronaldo SUUIII 24 November 2022 2318 Why does the iphone 8 plus perform better than the iphone X and iphone 8? +51 Reply RuTH 02 September 2022 0316 I have an iPad mini 5 and Sharp Aquos R3, which are all good. Play games using iPad mini 5, play Apex or use a social apps use Sharp Aquos R3 because have 120hz. +8 Reply Nobody 01 December 2021 1137 The funny thing is this lowly Sharp Aquos R3 has SD855 with a price tag of around $130 but for Ipad Mini 5 around 5 times more expensive XD +28 Reply Ur 15 November 2021 1522 Keep in mind the SD 855 is much cheaper +21 Reply Namdi 15 October 2021 1141 Well experience justified more. Apple always has better performance and optimisation. Android scale to run short however android Snapdragon turns to be in equilibrium with apple but upto some extent. Don't mind but apple always ahead +11 Reply chris Do 28 July 2021 2047 Their performance nearly the same but apple always have better optimization so i’ll go for a12 +33 Reply Do chris 30 September 2021 0211 Their performance nearly the same but mi 9T pro had half the price and even more than half, can't complain much for 855 +18 Reply Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855Mengapa Apple A12 Bionic lebih baik daripada Qualcomm Snapdragon 855?Bandwidth memori lebih banyak? Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 lebih baik daripada Apple A12 Bionic?CPU speed lebih cepat?1 x & 3 x & 4 x x & 4 x threads 2 buah lebih banyak?8vs6Mendownload 2x lebih cepat?2000MBits/svs1000MBits/sMenggunakan HMP?Memiliki dukungan 5G?Mengupload lebih cepat?318MBits/svs150MBits/sUlasan penggunaPeringkat keseluruhanApple A12 Bionic8 Ulasan penggunaApple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 8558 Ulasan penggunaQualcomm Snapdragon 855FiturInfo UmumSistem operasi 32-bit hanya dapat mendukung RAM sampai 4GB. Sedangkan 64-bit bisa lebih dari 4GB, otomatis performanya lebih baik. Sistem 64-bit juga bisa menjalankan aplikasi kartu grafis yang disematkan, kamu tidak perlu membeli kartu grafis kecil memberikan kinerja yang lebih baik dan konsumsi daya yang lebih rendah. Chipset dengan jumlah transistor yang lebih banyak, komponen semikonduktor perangkat elektronik menawarkan lebih banyak daya komputasi. Faktor bentuk kecil memungkinkan lebih banyak transistor untuk dipasang pada sebuah chip, oleh karena itu meningkatkan Processing Unit GPU memiliki kecepatan clock yang lebih DirectX Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicDirectX digunakan untuk permainan, dengan versi terbaru mendukung grafik yang lebih wireless generasi kelima memberikan kecepatan yang lebih tinggi dan latensi yang lebih rendah daripada teknologi generasi keempat GPU Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicKetika GPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan OpenGL ES Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicOpenGL ES digunakan untuk permainan di perangkat mobile seperti smartphones. Versi terbaru untuk grafik yang lebih baikversi OpenCL Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicBeberapa aplikasi menggunakan OpenCL untuk mengatur Graphics Processing Unit GPU untuk komputasi non-graphical. Versi terbaru memperkenalkan banyak fungsi dan performa lebih CPU menunjukkan berapa banyak siklus pemrosesan per detik yang dapat dijalankan oleh CPU, dengan mempertimbangkan semua intinya unit pemrosesan. Ini dihitung dengan menambahkan clock rate masing-masing inti atau, dalam hal prosesor multi-inti yang menggunakan berbagai arsitektur mikro, masing-masing kelompok banyak hasil thread dalam performa yang lebih cepat dan multitasking yang lebih teknologi sebuah chip dapat beralih di antara dua set inti prosesor untuk memaksimalkan kinerja dan daya tahan baterai. Misalnya, saat bermain game, inti yang lebih kuat akan digunakan untuk meningkatkan kinerja, sedangkan memeriksa email akan menggunakan inti yang kurang kuat untuk memaksimalkan daya tahan Multi-Processing HMP adalah versi yang lebih canggih dari teknologi Dalam pengaturan ini, prosesor dapat menggunakan semua inti pada saat yang sama, atau hanya satu inti untuk tugas dengan intensitas rendah. Sehingga dapat memberikan kinerja yang kuat atau meningkatkan daya tahan CPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan L2 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L2 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan L1 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L1 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan clock Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Clock multiplier mengatur kecepatan CPUcache L3 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L3 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan memori yang lebih cepat, yang menghasilkan performa sistem lebih DDR Double Data Rate adalah jenis RAM paling umum. Versi DDR yang lebih baru mendukung kecepatan maksimum yang lebih tinggi dan lebih hemat memori maksimum RAM yang adalah tingkat maksimum yang data dapat dibaca dari atau disimpan ke dalam memori Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicLebih banyak kanal memori meningkatkan kecepatan perpindahan data antara memori dan CPUversi eMMC Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Versi eMMC yang lebih tinggi memungkinkan antarmuka memori yang lebih cepat, berdampak positif pada kinerja perangkat. Misalnya, saat mentransfer file dari komputer ke penyimpanan internal melalui kode perbaikan kesalahan dapat mendeteksi kerusakan data. Ini digunakan ketika sangat penting menghidari kerusakan, seperti scientific computing atau ketika menjalankan pada sebuah chip SoC memiliki chip seluler LTE terintegrasi. LTE mampu men-download dengan kecepatan lebih cepat dari yang sebelumnya yaitu, teknologi unduh adalah ukuran bandwith koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum yang digunakan suatu perangkat untuk mengakses konten unggah adalah ukuran bandwidth koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum di mana sebuah perangkat dapat mengirim informasi ke server atau perangkat teknologi yang diintegrasikan kepada processor untuk mengamankan perangkat untuk digunakan dengan fitur-fitur seperti pembayaran telepon, dan video streaming menggunakan digital rights management DRMTeknologi multithreading seperti Hyperthreading dari Intel atau Simultanous Multithreading dari AMD memberikan peningkatan kinerja dengan memisahkan tiap-tiap inti fisik prosesor menjadi inti virtual, yang juga dikenal sebagai thread. Dengan cara ini, setiap inti dapat menjalankan dua aliran instruksi bit membantu melindungi komputer dari serangan yang dilakukan dalam satu waktu Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855NEON menyediakan akeslerasi untuk memproses media, seperti mendengarkan MP3AES digunakan untuj mempercepat enkripsi dan VFP Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Vector Floating-Point VFP digunakan oleh processor untuk memberikan peningkatan kinerja di area seperti gambar 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti tunggal prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti banyak dari sebuah prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023hasil PassMark Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Penghitungan ini mengukur kinerja CPU menggunakan multiple threadPenghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU menggunakan single threadhasil PassMark overclocked Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Penghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU ketika di Bluetooth Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicBluetooth adalah standar teknologi wireless yang memungkinkan transfer data antar perangkat yang ditempatkan dalam jarak dekat, menggunakan gelombang radio frekuensi ultra-tinggi dengan panjang gelombang pendek. Versi yang lebih baru menyediakan transfer data yang lebih Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Tunjukkan semuaThis page is currently only available in English.